Key result
The Clinical Frailty Scale predicts ~266% higher 30-day mortality in elderly SAVR patients.
Why the study?
This study explored the impact of the Clinical Frailty Scale on prosthesis selection and early postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement.
Does the Clinical Frailty Scale predict prosthesis selection and early mortality in elderly patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement?
Cohort (n=122)
No
Does the Clinical Frailty Scale predict prosthesis selection and early mortality in elderly patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement?
Effect estimate: OR 3.66 (95% CI 1.31-10.18)
p-value: p=0.010
The Clinical Frailty Scale is a significant predictor of valve selection and 30-day mortality in elderly patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, outperforming the traditional EuroSCORE II.
May refine preoperative risk stratification in elderly SAVR patients; leaves open whether frailty should guide prosthesis selection.
Introduction: This study explored the impact of the Clinical Frailty Scale on prosthesis selection and early postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement. Materials and Method: In this retrospective cohort study conducted at a single center, patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement between January 2023 and January 2025 were examined. The Clinical Frailty Scale was used to evaluate preoperative frailty and categorize patients into three frailty levels. Data on implanted valves (mechanical, conventional bioprosthesis, and sutureless bioprosthesis), operative details, and 30-day mortality were collected. Multivariate regression models were used to identify significant associations. Results: A total of 122 patients were included in the study. Patients with higher Clinical Frailty Scale scores were more likely to receive sutureless valves (p<0.001). Clinical Frailty Scale was a moderate predictor of early mortality, with an odds ratio of 3.66 and 95% confidence interval of 1.31–10.18 (p = 0.010), outperforming EuroSCORE II in predictive accuracy (AUC 0.71 compared to 0.63). Patients with sutureless valves had shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays (p<0.001), whereas complications remained consistent across the valve types. A weak but significant positive correlation was observed between prosthesis size/ body surface area ratio and 30-day mortality (Spearman’s ρ=0.186; p=0.040). Conclusion: The Clinical Frailty Scale is a significant indicator of valve selection and prediction of early postoperative mortality in elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Incorporating frailty evaluation into presurgery planning could improve outcomes in this at-risk group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koç et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis (n=122). Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) vs. EuroSCORE II was evaluated on 30-day all-cause mortality (OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.31-10.18, p=0.010). The Clinical Frailty Scale independently predicted 30-day mortality in elderly patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement with an OR of 3.66.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: