Key result
Younger age, lower NT-proBNP, and elevated HR predict AF/AFL-induced TCM in ~5% of hospitalized HF patients.
Why the study?
The prevalence of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter induced tachycardiomyopathy is unknown, and diagnosis remains challenging.
What is the prevalence of AF/AFL induced tachycardiomyopathy in hospitalized heart failure patients, and what are the clinical indicators for its diagnosis?
Cohort (n=480)
No
What is the prevalence of AF/AFL induced tachycardiomyopathy in hospitalized heart failure patients, and what are the clinical indicators for its diagnosis?
Approximately 5.4% of hospitalized heart failure patients have AF/AFL-induced tachycardiomyopathy, which can be identified by younger age, lower NT-pro-BNP, and higher resting heart rate.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid recognition of reversible TCM in select hospitalized HF patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) induced tachycardiomyopathy (TCM) has been known to cause reversible heart failure (HF) for many years. However, the prevalence of the disease is unknown, and diagnosis is challenging. Therefore, the aim of the present study was (1) to assess the rate of AF/AFL induced TCM and (2) to identify indicators for diagnosis. Methods Consecutively, all patients with a diagnosis of HF who were hospitalized in our department within 12 months were reviewed. For the main analysis, all patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and AF or AFL were included. AF/AFL induced TCM was diagnosed when there was at least a 10% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction under rhythm or rate control within 3 months. Patients with HFrEF with AF/AFL but without TCM served as control group. Results A total of 480 patients were included. AF/AFL induced TCM occurred in 26 patients (5.4%) and HFrEF with AF/AFL in 53 patients (11%). Independent indicators of AF/AFL induced TCM were age<79 years [Odds ratio 5.887, confidence interval (CI) 1.999–17.339, p < 0.001], NT-pro-BNP <5,419 pg/mL (Odds ratio 2.327, CI 1.141–4.746, p = 0.004), and a resting heart rate >112 bpm (Odds ratio 2.503, CI 1.288–4.864, p = 0.001). Conclusion Approximately 5% of all patients hospitalized for HF suffer from AF/AFL induced TCM. Improved discrimination of AF/AFL induced TCM to HFrEF with AF/AFL is possible considering age, NT-pro-BNP level, and resting heart rate >112 beats/minute. Based on these parameters, an earlier diagnosis and improved therapy might be possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ermert et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation or flutter (n=480). Indicators for AF/AFL induced TCM vs. HFrEF with AF/AFL without TCM was evaluated on Rate of AF/AFL induced TCM. AF/AFL induced tachycardiomyopathy occurred in 5.4% of hospitalized HF patients; independent diagnostic indicators were age <79 years (OR 5.887), NT-pro-BNP <5,419 pg/mL, and resting HR >112 bpm.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: