Key result
SERCA2a plasma levels are ~55% lower in advanced HF requiring MCS compared to stable patients.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether molecules involved in cardiomyocyte nucleo-cytoplasmic transport and calcium homeostasis can identify advanced HF patients needing mechanical circulatory support versus clinically stable elective transplant recipients.
Does plasma SERCA2a level differentiate patients with advanced heart failure requiring mechanical circulatory support from those who are clinically stable?
Cohort (n=29)
Does plasma SERCA2a level differentiate patients with advanced heart failure requiring mechanical circulatory support from those who are clinically stable?
Plasma SERCA2a levels may serve as a useful biomarker to identify patients with advanced heart failure who require mechanical circulatory support prior to heart transplantation.
Lower SERCA2a levels were associated with MCS need in advanced HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background: Heart failure (HF) alters the nucleo-cytoplasmic transport of cardiomyocytes and reduces SERCA2a levels, essential for intracellular calcium homeostasis. We consider in this study whether the molecules involved in these processes can differentiate those patients with advanced HF and the need for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as a bridge to recovery or urgent heart transplantation from those who are clinically stable and who are transplanted in an elective code. Material and method: Blood samples from 29 patients with advanced HF were analysed by ELISA, and the plasma levels of Importin5, Nucleoporin153 kDa, RanGTPase-Activating Protein 1 and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase were compared between patients requiring MCS and those patients without a MCS need prior to heart transplantation. Results: SERCA2a showed significantly lower levels in patients who had MCS compared to those who did not require it (0.501 ± 0.530 ng/mL vs. 1.123 ± 0.661 ng/mL; p = 0.01). A SERCA2a cut-off point of 0.84 ng/mL (AUC 0.812 ± 0.085, 95% CI: 0.646–0.979; p = 0.004) provided a 92% sensitivity, 62% specificity, 91% negative predictive value and 67% positive predictive value. Conclusions: In this cohort, patients with advanced HF and a need for MCS have shown significantly lower levels of SERCA2a as compared to stable patients without a need for MCS prior to heart transplantation. This is a small study with preliminary findings, and larger-powered dedicated studies are required to confirm and validate these results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ezzitouny et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart failure (n=29). SERCA2a biomarker assessment vs. Patients without a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) need was evaluated on SERCA2a plasma levels (ng/mL) (AUC 0.812, 95% CI 0.646-0.979, p=0.004). SERCA2a plasma levels were significantly lower in advanced heart failure patients requiring mechanical circulatory support compared to stable patients (0.501 vs 1.123 ng/mL; p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: