Key result
Nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay predicts ~170% greater SCD risk vs normal QRS, independent of LVEF.
Why the study?
Although QRS duration is associated with sudden cardiac death, the prognostic implications of different intraventricular conduction disorders remain unclear.
Do intraventricular conduction disorders increase the risk of sudden cardiac death in cardiac patients?
Cohort (n=26,028)
Outcome assessors blinded
Yes
Do intraventricular conduction disorders increase the risk of sudden cardiac death in cardiac patients?
Effect estimate: SDH 2.7 (95% CI 2.1-3.6)
p-value: p=< .0001
Nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay and prolonged QRS are strong, independent predictors of sudden cardiac death in cardiac patients, even after adjusting for left ventricular ejection fraction.
BACKGROUND: QRS duration is associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD). The prognostic implications of different intraventricular conduction disorders (IVCDs) are unclear. OBJECTIVE: We explored the risk of SCDs associated with prolonged QRS (110-119 ms), right bundle branch block, left bundle branch block (LBBB), and nonspecific IVCD (NIVCD) in cardiac patients. METHODS: We analyzed the data from 4 cohorts comprising data of 26,028 cardiac patients undergoing either coronary angiography or clinical exercise testing. The median follow-up time for SCD events was 8.4 years (5.5-11.6). SCD events were classified according to strict criteria and full access to all written medical records including results of medicolegal autopsies. IVCDs were classified by researchers blinded to outcome data. The risk associated with IVCDs compared with normal QRS (<110 ms) was calculated using subdistribution hazard (SDH) analysis. RESULTS: SCDs occurring in patients with IVCD (19.2% of all patients; n = 5007) accounted for 33% of all SCDs (30%-36%) (n = 1162 events). In age- and sex-adjusted analysis, NIVCD showed the strongest association with SCD (SDH 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-3.6; P < .0001), followed by LBBB (SDH 2.0; 95% CI 1.5-2.6; P < .0001), prolonged QRS (SDH 1.9; 95% CI 1.6-2.3; P < .0001), and right bundle branch block (SDH 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-1.9; P = .003). NIVCD and prolonged QRS also associated significantly with SCD despite adjusting for baseline clinical risk factors and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). LBBB associated significantly with SCD after adjusting for risk factors but not after adjusting for LVEF. CONCLUSION: NIVCD and prolonged QRS are strong predictors of SCD events despite adjusting for risk factors including LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lahti et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiac patients (n=26,028). Intraventricular conduction disorders (IVCDs) vs. Normal QRS (<110 ms) was evaluated on Sudden cardiac death (SCD) (SDH 2.7, 95% CI 2.1-3.6, p=< .0001). Nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay was the strongest predictor of sudden cardiac death compared to normal QRS (SDH 2.7; 95% CI 2.1-3.6; P<0.0001), independent of LVEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: