Why the study?
Phase II trials have inherent limitations and cannot fully predict phase III outcomes, necessitating insights to help derisk go/no-go decisions in heart failure drug development.
This position paper outlines the value and constraints of phase II clinical trials in heart failure to help investigators and sponsors derisk go/no-go decisions for phase III.
Phase II limitations warrant cautious go/no-go decisions in heart failure; extends consensus guidance for investigators and sponsors.
Phase II clinical trials play an important role in drug development, providing key data that guide decision-making for promising therapeutic candidates. An important objective of phase II is to establish proof of concept by demonstrating that the drug produces its intended biological effects in the target population. Phase II trials also evaluate pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and dose-response relationships. Ultimately, the goal is to generate the evidence needed to inform go/no-go decisions for further development. However, as we will discuss, phase II studies have inherent limitations and cannot fully predict phase III outcomes. In this JACC: Basic to Translational Science and Heart Failure Collaboratory position paper, we examine the value and constraints of phase II programs, using prior examples of heart failure trials, with the goal of providing insights that will help investigators and sponsors to derisk go/no-go decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mann et al. (2025) conducted a review in Heart Failure. Phase II heart failure trials provide key data for go/no-go decisions but have inherent limitations and cannot fully predict phase III outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: