Key result
Beta-blocker utilization in Ethiopian HFrEF patients achieves optimal target doses in only ~8% of cases.
Why the study?
Beta-blockers are often underutilized or underdosed in HFrEF, and comprehensive evaluations of their utilization and dosing practices remain limited in Ethiopia.
Cross-Sectional (n=200)
Yes
Despite high prescription rates of beta-blockers in Ethiopian HFrEF patients, dose optimization remains severely limited, highlighting a significant gap in guideline-directed medical therapy implementation.
Dose titration lags prescriptions in Ethiopian HFrEF; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve GDMT optimization.
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based beta-blockers are essential in managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and are known to improve cardiovascular outcomes. Despite robust nascent guideline recommendations, studies indicate that beta-blockers are often underutilized or administered below target doses. This shivery issue is particularly relevant in Ethiopia, where comprehensive evaluations of beta-blocker utilization and dosing practices are limited. The Northeast region, specifically Dessie, remains underexplored in this context. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the appropriate usage trend and dose optimization of beta-blockers among HFrEF patients attending ambulatory clinics of Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (DCSH) and Boru Meda General Hospital (BMH), Dessie, Ethiopia, 2024 G.C. METHODS: A cross-sectional, multi-center study was conducted from February 1 to July 30, 2024, involving 200 randomly selected adult patients with confirmed HFrEF (120 from DCSH and 80 from BMH), who had at least 6-month regular follow-up visits at their respective ambulatory clinics. The study rigorously followed the latest (2022) American Heart Association (AHA) guideline recommendation. Patient's medical records was reviewed to gather the necessary data. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with beta-blocker use. Statistical significance was declared at p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: Among the 200 patients, 88% were prescribed beta-blockers. About 15% of the patients were not receiving beta-blockers whereas they are indicated. Out of the total, 96.5% received guideline-recommended beta-blockers, with bisoprolol being the most common (65%), followed by metoprolol (29%) and carvedilol (3%). Only 13% of beta-blocker users were on optimal doses, with average daily doses of 27.9 mg for metoprolol succinate, 10.0 mg for carvedilol, and 4.8 mg for bisoprolol. Factors positively associated with beta-blocker use included Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor use (AOR: 15.48, 95% CI: 2.11-113.54, p = 0.007), and taking multiple medications (AOR: 7.12, 95% CI: 1.54-33.02, p = 0.012), while ingestion of secondary prevention agents (AOR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.98, p = 0.048) and male gender (AOR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.47, p = 0.005) were negatively associated. Baseline ejection fraction of 25-40% (AOR: 5.44, 95% CI: 1.09-27.12, P = 0.039) was a sole predictor for sub-optimal beta-blocker use. CONCLUSION: Although most patients with HFrEF were prescribed evidence-based beta-blockers, only a limited number reached the optimal dosing levels. It is crucial to align clinical practice with the latest guidelines, prioritize ongoing research, and enhance educational efforts for both healthcare providers and patients. By doing so, it is possible to significantly improve the effective utilization of beta-blockers, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes in this region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassen et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=200). Beta-blockers was evaluated on Beta-blocker utilization. Among ambulatory patients with HFrEF in Northeast Ethiopia, 88% were prescribed beta-blockers, but only 7.6% of those on guideline-recommended therapies achieved optimal target doses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: