Why the study?
No treatment has been unequivocally demonstrated to prevent or treat autoimmune congenital heart block, and a better understanding of events leading to its development is needed to improve surveillance and treatment strategies.
Type I interferon and innate immune activation may play a key role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune congenital heart block, offering potential new avenues for surveillance and treatment.
Does not support practice changes in anti-Ro/La pregnancies; leaves open therapeutic targeting of type I interferon pathways.
Autoimmune congenital heart block (CHB) may develop in foetuses of women carrying anti-Ro/SSA and La/SSB autoantibodies and is characterized by disruption of signal conduction at the atrioventricular (AV) node, resulting in partial or complete AV block. If not fatal in utero, complete CHB typically requires lifelong cardiac pacing. No treatment has so far been unequivocally demonstrated to prevent or treat autoimmune CHB, and the relatively low incidence (1%-5%) and recurrence (12%-16%) rates of second/third-degree AV block add to the complexity of managing pregnancies in women with anti-Ro/La antibodies. Altogether, a better understanding of events leading to development of autoimmune CHB is needed to improve surveillance and treatment strategies. In the past decade, studies have started to look beyond the role of maternal autoantibodies in disease pathogenesis to assess other contributing factors such as foetal genetics and, more recently, immune responses in foetuses and neonates of anti-Ro/La antibody-positive women. In this review, we provide an update on the epidemiology, clinical presentation and current treatment approaches of autoimmune CHB, summarize the previously proposed pathogenic mechanisms implicating maternal autoantibodies, and discuss the recent findings of type I interferon (IFN) and innate immune activation in foetuses with autoimmune CHB and in neonates of anti-Ro/La antibody-positive mothers, and how these may contribute to autoimmune CHB pathogenesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ambrosi et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: