Key result
Hydroxychloroquine shows the strongest evidence for preventing congenital heart block in anti-Ro/La positive pregnancies.
Why the study?
Complete congenital heart block due to anti-Ro/La antibodies in pregnancy leads to adverse outcomes, but guidelines do not recommend specific preventive treatments.
Do prophylactic treatments such as hydroxychloroquine prevent congenital heart block in pregnant women with anti-Ro/La antibodies?
Systematic Review (n=2,134)
Do prophylactic treatments such as hydroxychloroquine prevent congenital heart block in pregnant women with anti-Ro/La antibodies?
Hydroxychloroquine shows the most evidence for preventing congenital heart block in pregnancies of women with anti-Ro/La antibodies, though current data is limited by high risk of bias.
Supports HCQ for primary CHB prophylaxis in anti-Ro pregnancies; extends heterogeneous evidence but needs RCT confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: Complete congenital heart block (CHB) due to anti-Ro/La antibodies in pregnancy can lead to adverse fetal outcomes and neonatal death. National and international guidelines do not recommend specific treatment for women identified with anti-Ro antibodies while pregnant. DESIGN: Systematic review of studies of pregnant women with anti-Ro/La antibodies undertaking treatment(s) to prevent CHB. Studies solely focused on treating developing or established CHB were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: CHB incidence. RESULTS: Of 1049 articles, 20 studies were eligible, of which 13 were retrospective. Sixteen studies contained usable data comparing various treatments (seven hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), six corticosteroids, two intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and one each on combined HCQ and corticosteroids and plasmapheresis), including 2134 women and 2915 pregnancies. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity. HCQ as primary prophylaxis showed protective effect on CHB incidence in four of five studies, whereas for preventing recurrence, only one study had a comparator arm, which showed a protective effect. Corticosteroids showed protective effect on CHB incidence as primary prophylaxis in two of three studies, whereas in recurrence, only one study showed protective effect. The IVIG study with a comparator showed no protective effect on CHB recurrence. Two studies (IVIG and plasmapheresis) had no comparator. The long-term toxicity of treatments was poorly investigated. CONCLUSION: HCQ showed the most evidence among various treatment options to prevent CHB in babies of women with anti-Ro/La antibodies. However, included studies had high risk of bias and imprecision. Future studies should be prospective, compare existing treatments and capture adverse effects.PROSPERO registration number CRD42023492934.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agarwal et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Congenital heart block (n=2,134). Hydroxychloroquine, corticosteroids, IVIG, or plasmapheresis vs. Comparator arm (where available) was evaluated on CHB incidence. Hydroxychloroquine showed the most evidence to prevent congenital heart block in babies of women with anti-Ro/La antibodies, demonstrating a protective effect as primary prophylaxis in 4 of 5 studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: