Exploratory regression analysis identifies factors influencing final grades in a Doctor of Pharmacy program, suggesting broader applicability.
OBJECTIVE: Examine variables internal and external to the classroom and their relationship with final course outcomes within a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) program using exploratory linear regression analysis. METHODS: Data were collected from students enrolled in a required Pharmacotherapy I course in fall 2023. An exploratory linear regression model was generated using eight variables. Variables included in the final model were derived from PharmD admissions data, course learning analytics, and a voluntary survey administered in the course about student study habits. RESULTS: A complete data set was collected from 57 out of 98 students (58%). Correlations among variables revealed final course grade was positively associated with sense of belonging (r=.544), GPA at time of matriculation (r=.537), spending 15 or more hours on co-curriculars in a month (r=.421), and average practice quiz score (r=.214). Final course grade was negatively correlated with an Early Warning and Intervention (EWI) policy triggered (r=-.652), progression committee attendance (as related to other courses) (r=-.553), attending office hours to study for an exam (r=-.401) (open to all, but required for students who trigger the EWI policy), and usage of recorded lectures (r=-.377). The revised regression model is statistically significant (F(8, 48)=16.763, p<.001) CONCLUSION: A combination of factors matter in determining final course grades, including those directly connected to the class and those outside of it. A similar approach could be replicated by others interested in exploring influences on learning outcomes in their own courses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janetski et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: