PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Brain and Behavior0 citationsOpen Access

The Correlation Between Apathy and the Efficacy of Rehabilitation in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Retrospective Observational Study

View Full Paper
JFJ G FangKCKeke ChenYLYonghong Liu

Key Points

  • To evaluate the relationship between apathy status and rehabilitation outcomes in patients with Parkinson's disease.
  • Retrospective analysis of records from 122 patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment.
  • Grouped patients by apathy status using the Modified Apathy Evaluation Scale.
  • Conducted multiple linear regression analyses adjusting for baseline measures of MDS-UPDRS III, FTSTS, and TUG.
  • PDA- group showed significant improvements in MDS-UPDRS III (p < 0.001), M-PAS (p < 0.001), FTSTS (p = 0.011), and TUG (p < 0.001).
  • No significant improvements were observed in the PDA+ group.
  • Higher apathy scores were independently associated with smaller improvements in MDS-UPDRS III in multivariable regression (β = 0.147, p = 0.027).

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Apathy impacts mood and social functioning in patients with Parkinson's disease (PWP), and its effect on motor rehabilitation outcomes remains unexplored. Objective This study evaluates whether the presence of apathy (apathy status) is associated with rehabilitation outcomes in PWP. Methods We retrospectively analyzed records of 122 PWP (Hoehn–Yahr stage ≤ 3) who underwent a 2‐week multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment (MIRT) between April 2020 and July 2024, dividing them into Parkinson's disease with apathy (PDA+, score > 14) and without apathy (PDA−, score ≤ 14) based on Modified Apathy Evaluation Scale (MAES). The outcome measures included the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS‐UPDRS III), the Modified Parkinson Activity Scale (M‐PAS), the Five Times Sit to Stand Test (FTSTS), the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and the 10‐Meter Walk Test (10MWT). We conducted group comparisons and employed multiple linear regression analyses, treating the MAES both as a dichotomous variable and as a continuous predictor. In these analyses, we adjusted for baseline measures of MDS‐UPDRS III, FTSTS, and TUG. Additionally, we performed sensitivity analyses using alternative cutoffs (MAES > 13 and > 15). Results Following MIRT, the PDA– group ( n = 75) showed significant improvements in MDS‐UPDRS III, M‐PAS, FTSTS, and TUG ( p 14 vs. ≤ 14) produced similar results ( β = 2.378, 95% CI 0.341–4.415, p = 0.023; R 2 = 0.148). Sensitivity analyses using cutoffs of > 13 and > 15 yielded qualitatively comparable findings. Conclusions Baseline apathy severity was associated with attenuated motor improvement after MIRT in PWP; understanding its mechanisms is crucial for personalized rehabilitation and treatment effectiveness. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2000033768, 2020/06/11

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b3f7880e6d24efe1098https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71480
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper