Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Consensus recommendations clarify nomenclature for autoantibodies in autoimmune diseases, improving precision.
OBJECTIVES: Autoantibodies directed against Telomerase RNA Ro y-RNAs and Vault RNAs Domain Family Member 2 (TROVE2)/Ro60 and Tripartite Motif 21 (TRIM21)/Ro52 are historically related to distinct SSA/Ro autoantigens. However, despite advances facilitating separate testing, these autoantibodies remain frequently confused resulting in a lack of clarity and precision in the literature. We conducted a systematic literature review to inform a Delphi process to achieve consensus on a clearer, harmonised nomenclature. METHODS: The systematic review included primary publications in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sjögren disease (SjD) published between January 1, 2000 and May 26, 2025 that mentioned testing for anti-TROVE2/Ro60 and/or anti-TRIM21/Ro52 autoantibodies. This analysis contributed to a Delphi consensus exercise proposing preferred nomenclature by a group of 17 international expert physicians and laboratorians. RESULTS: Eight hundred ninety-one publications were included (301 SLE, 493 SjD, and 97 mixed SLE/SjD). Only 20.9% of studies tested and reported the autoantibodies separately; 75.0% did neither; and 4.2% tested but did not report them separately. There was considerable nomenclatural heterogeneity with 16 different terms used for anti-TROVE2/Ro60 and 11 terms for anti-TRIM21/Ro52 autoantibodies. After 2 rounds of voting, the Delphi panel reached a unanimous consensus on the terms anti-TROVE2/Ro60 and anti-TRIM21/Ro52 autoantibodies. CONCLUSIONS: The distinction of anti-TROVE2/Ro60 and anti-TRIM21/Ro52 autoantibodies was frequently unclear and imprecise throughout the literature. Their clinical associations also lacked clarity and precision. To clarify and strengthen the understanding of the clinical associations of these 2 important autoantibodies, the terms anti-TROVE2/Ro60 and anti-TRIM21/Ro52 are recommended for future studies and publications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikolic et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: