PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026International Journal of Molecular and Immuno Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Preventing cytomegalovirus in high-risk haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant: A dual case comparison of letermovir prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis

View Full Paper
SLShaileshkumar Pravinsinh LavanaANAnuvarsh NairKPKrushika Patel

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of letermovir prophylaxis in preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation post haploidentical HSCT.
  • Two adult male patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia were compared: one receiving letermovir and one not.
  • Patient 1 started letermovir on transplant day and remained CMV-negative, while Patient 2 developed CMV reactivation requiring ganciclovir.
  • Both patients underwent similar conditioning and immunosuppressive treatments.
  • Patient 1 achieved full donor chimerism and no CMV-related issues, while Patient 2 had CMV reactivation with complications.
  • Patient 2 experienced additional challenges like thrombocytopenia and graft-versus-host disease.
  • The case comparison supports the efficacy of letermovir in preventing CMV reactivation.

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is a major concern following haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Letermovir is a novel CMV deoxyribonucleic acid terminase complex inhibitor without hematological and nephrotoxicity compared to traditional treatments. This case report compares two adult male patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia who underwent haploidentical HSCT with similar conditioning and immunosuppressive treatments. Patient 1 (36 years old) received letermovir starting on the day of transplant and remained CMV-negative during recovery. Although he experienced some issues like BK virus and acute kidney injury, he reached full donor chimerism and had no CMV-related problems. Patient 2 (52 years old) did not receive letermovir. He developed CMV reactivation confirmed by polymerase chain reaction and required treatment with ganciclovir. He also developed thrombocytopenia and graft-versus-host disease. This dual case comparison demonstrates the efficacy of letermovir prophylaxis in preventing CMV reactivation following haploidentical stem cell transplant. It supports the inclusion of letermovir in standard transplant protocols to improve the outcomes in resource-limited settings using affordable, bioequivalent formulations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lavana et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c037880e6d24efe1f3fhttps://doi.org/10.25259/ijmio_19_2025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper