Key result
Letermovir prophylaxis in haplo-HSCT recipients resulted in a 15.2% rate of breakthrough clinically significant CMV infection by 14 weeks and demonstrated survival benefits at 24 weeks.
Why the study?
The direct and indirect effects of letermovir prophylaxis in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients needed to be assessed.
Does letermovir prophylaxis reduce clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients compared to pre-emptive therapy?
Cohort (n=640)
Does letermovir prophylaxis reduce clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients compared to pre-emptive therapy?
Letermovir prophylaxis in haplo-HSCT recipients provides survival benefits at 24 weeks and beyond, though high-risk patients may require extended prophylaxis and immunological monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support letermovir in haplo-HSCT; leaves open randomized comparison to pre-emptive therapy.
Objectives To assess the direct and indirect effects of letermovir in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) recipients. Methods This prospective, single-arm study (April 2023 to April 2024) compared 200 haplo-HSCT recipients who received letermovir prophylaxis (median follow-up: 359 days) with 440 historical controls who received pre-emptive therapy. Results Of the patients who received letermovir, 15.2% developed breakthrough clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection (csCMVi) by 14 weeks, and 16.5% developed late csCMVi in weeks 14–24. No patients developed cytomegalovirus end-organ disease by 24 weeks; however, 35.0% developed Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection by 14 weeks. Patients with breakthrough csCMVi had significantly lower CD3 + , CD4 + , and CD8 + T-cell proportions and higher CD16 + CD56 + natural killer cell proportions at 4 weeks post-HSCT. Patients with late csCMVi had lower lymphocyte counts and T-cell subsets at 14 weeks post-HSCT. Post-HSCT organ dysfunction (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.43, P = 0.033) and letermovir initiation >2 weeks post-HSCT (HR: 2.34, P = 0.035) were independent risk factors for breakthrough csCMVi. Breakthrough csCMVi (HR: 2.14, P < 0.001), elevated CMV DNAemia (HR: 4.12, P < 0.001), and relapsed/refractory csCMVi (HR: 4.62, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for late csCMVi. Although letermovir was associated with delayed T-cell reconstitution, immune recovery normalized by 14 weeks. Survival benefits were evident at 24 weeks and persisted for ≥1 year. Conclusion High-risk patients warrant enhanced immunological monitoring and extended letermovir prophylaxis. Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT05789615).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) (n=640). Letermovir vs. Pre-emptive therapy (historical controls) was evaluated on breakthrough clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection (csCMVi) by 14 weeks. Letermovir prophylaxis in haplo-HSCT recipients resulted in a 15.2% rate of breakthrough clinically significant CMV infection by 14 weeks and demonstrated survival benefits at 24 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: