Key result
Letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of CMV reactivation compared to no prophylaxis (33.3% vs 76.2%, p<0.001) in CMV-seropositive allogeneic stem cell recipients.
Why the study?
CMV reactivation is a major complication and cause of mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, motivating investigation into the benefit of recently approved letermovir for CMV prophylaxis.
Does letermovir prophylaxis reduce CMV reactivation in CMV-seropositive allogeneic stem cell recipients?
Cohort (n=48)
No
Does letermovir prophylaxis reduce CMV reactivation in CMV-seropositive allogeneic stem cell recipients?
Letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduces CMV reactivation and improves 180-day overall survival in CMV-seropositive allogeneic stem cell recipients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support prophylaxis consideration in seropositive recipients; leaves open survival impact and practice change pending RCTs.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is one of the most clinically significant complications in allogeneic stem cell recipients and a frequent cause for transplantation related mortality. Letermovir is a newly available and recently approved drug for CMV prophylaxis. In a retrospective single center analysis, we investigated the benefit of letermovir as CMV prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 48 CMV-seropositive transplant recipients from January 2017 to August 2020 from our department. We compared the rate of CMV reactivation in patients who received letermovir as prophylaxis from day 0 after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) with a control group that did not receive CMV prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was CMV reactivation and was defined as an increase of CMV copies over 1250 Ul/ml in the peripheral blood; secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) up to 180 days, engraftment and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: We included 21 patients in the control group and 27 patients in the letermovir group. Letermovir treatment led to a significantly reduced incidence of CMV reactivation after alloSCT (33.3% in the letermovir group versus 76.2% in the control group, p<0.001). The OS at day 180 was 80.9% in the control group versus 92.6% in the letermovir group (p<0.05). The median duration of letermovir prophylaxis was 192±104 days. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that letermovir prophylaxis is associated with a significant lower risk of CMV reactivation and improved overall survival in CMV-seropositive stem cell recipients. Moreover, a prolonged use of letermovir prophylaxis might be a survival benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koch et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in CMV reactivation in allogeneic stem cell recipients (n=48). Letermovir prophylaxis vs. No CMV prophylaxis was evaluated on CMV reactivation (increase of CMV copies over 1250 Ul/ml in the peripheral blood) (p=<0.001). Letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of CMV reactivation compared to no prophylaxis (33.3% vs 76.2%, p<0.001) in CMV-seropositive allogeneic stem cell recipients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: