Key result
Enhanced clinical decision support links to ~26% higher beta-blocker prescribing for HF vs commercial tools.
Why the study?
Following a randomized trial where an enhanced clinical decision support tool improved heart failure prescribing, its real-world sustained effect compared with commercial clinical decision support remained to be evaluated.
Does an enhanced clinical decision support tool improve evidence-based prescribing of beta-blockers for heart failure compared to a commercial tool?
Observational (n=183)
Yes
Does an enhanced clinical decision support tool improve evidence-based prescribing of beta-blockers for heart failure compared to a commercial tool?
Applying implementation science methods to clinical decision support design significantly improves and sustains clinician adoption and evidence-based beta-blocker prescribing for heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enhanced CDS was associated with higher beta-blocker prescribing; leaves open outcome effects amid low-certainty evidence against benefit.
OBJECTIVES: In a randomized controlled trial, we found that applying implementation science (IS) methods and best practices in clinical decision support (CDS) design to create a locally customized, "enhanced" CDS significantly improved evidence-based prescribing of β blockers (BB) for heart failure compared with an unmodified commercially available CDS. At trial conclusion, the enhanced CDS was expanded to all sites. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real-world sustained effect of the enhanced CDS compared with the commercial CDS. METHODS: In this natural experiment of 28 primary care clinics, we compared clinics exposed to the commercial CDS (preperiod) to clinics exposed to the enhanced CDS (both periods). The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of alerts resulting in a BB prescription. Secondary outcomes included patient reach and clinician adoption (dismissals). RESULTS: There were 367 alerts for 183 unique patients and 171 unique clinicians (pre: March 2019-August 2019; post: October 2019-March 2020). The enhanced CDS increased prescribing by 26.1% compared with the commercial (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.0-35.1%), which is consistent with the 24% increase in the previous study. The odds of adopting the enhanced CDS was 81% compared with 29% with the commercial (odds ratio: 4.17, 95% CI: 1.96-8.85). The enhanced CDS adoption and effectiveness rates were 62 and 14% in the preperiod and 92 and 10% in the postperiod. CONCLUSION: Applying IS methods with CDS best practices was associated with improved and sustained clinician adoption and effectiveness compared with a commercially available CDS tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trinkley et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=183). Enhanced clinical decision support (CDS) vs. Commercially available CDS was evaluated on Proportion of alerts resulting in a beta-blocker prescription (26.1% increase, 95% CI 17.0-35.1%). An enhanced clinical decision support tool increased evidence-based prescribing of beta-blockers for heart failure by 26.1% (95% CI: 17.0-35.1%) compared with a commercial tool.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: