Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article draws on research into using reader-response theory as a way of thinking about teaching grammar and poetry in the English classroom. Framing my discussion around world-based models of reader-response such as Transactional Theory (Rosenblatt 1938 Rosenblatt, L. 1938. Literature as Exploration. New York, NY: Appleton Century Crofts. [Google Scholar], 1978 Rosenblatt, L. 1978. The Reader, the Text and the Poem. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. [Google Scholar]) and Text World Theory (Gavins 2007 Gavins, J. 2007. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.[Crossref] , [Google Scholar]; Werth 1999 Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman. [Google Scholar]), I argue that this approach is useful in that it foregrounds the creative nature of reading whilst providing a systematic way of analysing language. I analyse data from a series of Key Stage 3 poetry lessons, showing how world-based approaches provide a “concept-driven pedagogical tool” for the teaching of grammar, giving KS3 students the opportunity to build and develop on KS2 grammatical knowledge. I also show how this approach helped to produce authentic responses to literature and generated meta-reflective discussions on the reading process. I argue that this approach offers an intuitive, accessible and contextualised method for exploring how language and grammar work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ian Cushing (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: