Key result
Hemodynamic monitoring-guided perioperative fluid therapy reduces postoperative complications by maintaining optimal fluid balance.
Why the study?
Inadequate perioperative infusion therapy leads to complications, and optimal therapy is difficult to achieve with standard parameters alone.
Does goal-directed fluid therapy guided by continuous hemodynamic monitoring reduce perioperative complications in surgical patients?
Comparison
Perioperative targeted infusion therapy based on central hemodynamic parameters vs standard parameters
Design
Analytical review
Authors
Loading...
Should not yet change practice; leaves open confirmation of benefits in prospective trials.
Does goal-directed fluid therapy guided by continuous hemodynamic monitoring reduce perioperative complications in surgical patients?
Continuous hemodynamic monitoring to guide perioperative fluid therapy helps maintain optimal fluid balance and reduces complications compared to standard vital sign monitoring.
Dmytrіiev et al. (2022) conducted a review in Perioperative complications. Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDT) guided by central hemodynamic monitoring vs. Standard parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, central venous pressure) was evaluated on Complications (surgical site infections, pneumonia, urinary tract infections). Perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy guided by real-time, continuous hemodynamic monitoring helps maintain optimal fluid balance and reduces the risk of postoperative complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: