Key result
Waist circumference was the best predictor of total adiposity (R2 = 0.92), while waist-to-hip ratio was the strongest correlate for visceral adipose tissue volume (r = 0.85, P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does MRI reliably measure regional and total adipose tissue distribution and how does it correlate with anthropometric variables in healthy men?
Cross-Sectional (n=27)
Does MRI reliably measure regional and total adipose tissue distribution and how does it correlate with anthropometric variables in healthy men?
MRI offers a reliable measure of regional and total adipose tissue distribution, demonstrating that waist circumference is the best predictor of total adiposity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support anthropometrics for adiposity estimation in healthy men; leaves open validation in broader clinical cohorts.
This study had two objectives: 1) to establish magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a tool for measuring total and regional adipose tissue (AT) distribution in humans and 2) to assess the relationship between selected anthropometric variables and MRI-measured AT. Twenty-seven healthy men varying in age [40.8 +/- 14.5 (SD) yr], body mass index (28.5 +/- 4.8), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR, 0.96 +/- 0.07) participated in the study. Total AT volume was determined using a linear interpolation of AT areas obtained on consecutive slices (n = 41) taken from head to toe (10-mm thickness, 50-mm centers). The mean change for repeated measures of total AT volume was 2.9% (range 0.9-4.3%). Large interindividual differences were observed for total AT volume (6.9-59.3 liters), subcutaneous AT (6.3-49.8 liters), and visceral AT (0.5-8.5 liters). Visceral AT represented 18.3% of the total AT. The single best predictor of total adiposity was waist circumference (R2 = 0.92). For visceral AT volume, WHR was the strongest anthropometric correlate (r = 0.85, P less than 0.01). When controlled for age and adiposity, however, WHR explained only 12% of the variation in absolute visceral AT and less than 1% of the variation in visceral-to-subcutaneous ratio. Age was a better predictor of visceral-to-subcutaneous ratio than level of adiposity or WHR. The results of this study demonstrate that MRI offers a reliable measure of regional and total AT distribution in humans and, thus, is of value as a research tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ross et al. (1992) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=27). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs. Anthropometric variables was evaluated on Relationship between anthropometric variables and MRI-measured adipose tissue (r 0.85, p=<0.01). Waist circumference was the best predictor of total adiposity (R2 = 0.92), while waist-to-hip ratio was the strongest correlate for visceral adipose tissue volume (r = 0.85, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: