Key result
Severe CAC despite normal SPECT linked to ~255% higher cardiac event risk versus minimal CAC.
Why the study?
CACS and SPECT both provide prognostic information, but whether integrating these tests better predicts short- and long-term cardiac events was unclear.
Do coronary artery calcium score and stress myocardial perfusion imaging provide independent and complementary prediction of cardiac risk in asymptomatic subjects without previous cardiovascular disease?
Population
1,126 generally asymptomatic subjects without previous cardiovascular disease
Comparison
Risk prediction across CACS categories and stress SPECT results
Design
Cohort study
Follow-up
Median 6.9 years
Authors
Loading...
May refine long-term risk assessment when SPECT is normal; leaves open whether CACS integration alters management.
Cohort (n=1,126)
Do coronary artery calcium score and stress myocardial perfusion imaging provide independent and complementary prediction of cardiac risk in asymptomatic subjects without previous cardiovascular disease?
Effect estimate: 3.55-fold relative increase
p-value: p=<0.001
CACS provides independent and complementary prognostic information to SPECT imaging, identifying high long-term cardiac risk even in patients with normal SPECT results.
Chang et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic without previous cardiovascular disease (n=1,126). Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and stress SPECT vs. Minimal CACS (≤10) was evaluated on Total cardiac events and all-cause death/myocardial infarction (3.55-fold relative increase, p=<0.001). A severe coronary artery calcium score (>400) in subjects with a normal SPECT result was associated with a 3.55-fold relative increase in any cardiac event compared to a minimal score (≤10).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: