Key result
Adding high CACS to negative SPECT-MPI detects ~8% more patients with significant CAD.
Why the study?
CAD underestimation is a major pitfall of SPECT-MPI, and the integration of SPECT-MPI with CACS has been seldom evaluated.
Does the addition of coronary artery calcium scoring to SPECT-MPI improve the detection of significant coronary artery disease in patients with suspected CAD?
Observational (n=124)
Does the addition of coronary artery calcium scoring to SPECT-MPI improve the detection of significant coronary artery disease in patients with suspected CAD?
Adding coronary artery calcium scoring to SPECT-MPI in negative cases improves the detection of significant coronary artery disease by 8%, reducing the risk of disease underestimation.
May aid CAD detection after negative SPECT-MPI; leaves open whether integration alters management or outcomes.
PURPOSE: Coronary artery disease (CAD) underestimation represents a major pitfall of single-photon emission computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI). Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) has emerged as a sensitive tool for the assessment of suspect CAD; however, the integration of SPECT-MPI with CACS has been seldom evaluated, so far, and was therefore the aim of the present study. METHODS: Patients undergoing SPECT-MPI with CACS and subsequent coronary angiography were included. ROC curves were used to identify the CACS values best predictive for CAD. In SPECT-MPI negative patients, the formula: defined the optimal CACS cut-points. The Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 was applied for 10-year cardiovascular risk estimation. Significant CAD was defined for an epicardial coronary stenosis >70 or 50% for the left main. RESULTS: Among 124 patients, 61 (49.19%) displayed positive SPECT-MPI, whereas 69 (56%) had significant CAD at angiography. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) for SPECT-MPI were, respectively, 74, 82, and 84%. Considering 63 SPECT-MPI negative cases, the index values for CACS at the optimal cutoff value of 1949 were: sensitivity 28%, specificity 89%, and PPV 50%, allowing to further detect five (8%) of the patients with significant CAD. The increased discriminative power of the combined SPECT-MPI with CACS was not conditioned by the pretest cardiovascular risk. CONCLUSION: Among patients with suspect CAD undergoing SPECT-MPI, the addition of CACS in negative cases allows to detect a consistent further 8% of patients with significant CAD, thus limiting the risk of disease underestimation and offering potential prognostic benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calandri et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Suspect coronary artery disease (n=124). Combined SPECT-MPI with CACS vs. SPECT-MPI alone was evaluated on Detection of significant CAD (epicardial coronary stenosis >70% or 50% for left main). Adding Coronary Artery Calcium Score (CACS >1949) to negative SPECT-MPI cases detected an additional 8% of patients with significant coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: