Key result
Having 5-7 ideal CV health metrics is linked to ~53% lower all-cause mortality versus 0-1.
Why the study?
The relationship between ideal cardiovascular health and health outcomes has been rarely assessed in middle-income countries.
Does a higher number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics reduce all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the Thai population?
Cohort (n=29,718)
Yes
Does a higher number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics reduce all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the Thai population?
Effect estimate: HR 0.47
Absolute Event Rate: 2.9% vs 19.4%
A higher number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics is strongly associated with reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a middle-income country population.
Supports CVH promotion in middle-income settings; extends prior evidence to Thai adults but remains hypothesis-generating.
The relationship of ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) and health outcomes has been rarely assessed in middle-income countries. We determined the ideal CVH metrics and association with all-cause and cardiovascular (CVD) mortality in the Thai population. We used baseline data from two rounds of the National Health Examination survey (15,219 participants in 2009 and 14,499 in 2014), and assessed all-cause and CVD deaths until 2020. The prevalence of 5-7 ideal CVH metrics in 2009 was 10.4% versus 9.5% in 2014. During a median follow-up of 7.1 years, the all-cause and CVD mortality rates were 19.4 and 4.6 per 1000 person-years for 0-1 ideal CVH metrics, and 13.0 and 2.1, 9.6 and 1.5, 6.0 and 1.0, and 2.9 and 0.4 per 1000 person-years for 2, 3, 4, and 5-7 ideal CVH metrics, respectively. Participants with 2, 3, 4, or 5-7 ideal metrics had a significantly lower risk of mortality than those with 0-1 ideal CVH metrics (adjusted hazard ratios: 0.75, 0.70, 0.60, and 0.47 for all-cause, and 0.54, 0.52, 0.50, and 0.31 for CVD, respectively). Individuals with a higher number of the modified ideal CVH metrics have a lower risk of all-cause and CVD mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aekplakorn et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular health (n=29,718). 5-7 ideal CVH metrics vs. 0-1 ideal CVH metrics was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.47). Having 5-7 ideal cardiovascular health metrics was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause (HR 0.47) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.31) compared to having 0-1 metrics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: