Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Deep ethical interpretivism has been the standard view of the nature of sport in the philosophy of sport for the past seventeen years or so. On this account excellence assumes the role of the foundational, ethical goal that justice assumes in Ronald Dworkin’s interpretivist model of law. However, since excellence in sports is not an ethical value, and since it should not be regarded as an ultimate goal, the case for the traditional account fails. It should be replaced by the shallow interpretivist model that I begin to sketch out and defend here.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sinclair A. MacRae (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: