PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1992AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology111 citations

Differences in rate dependence of transient outward current in rabbit and human atrium

View Full Paper
BFBernard FerminiTexas Tech UniversityZWZhiguo WangON Semiconductor (United States)DDDayue Darrel DuanNanjing University of Chinese Medicine

Key Result

Human atrial I(to1) is rate-independent at physiological rates (88.8% of peak at 4.0 Hz vs 0.1 Hz), unlike in rabbits (3.4%), due to a much faster reactivation time course.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Rabbit and human atrial myocytes (n=8 rabbit, n=8 human)
I
Intervention
Whole cell voltage-clamp recordings at physiological temperatures
C
Comparator
Comparison between rabbit and human atrial myocytes
O
Outcome
Rate dependency of transient outward current (I(to1)) and reactivation time coursesurrogate

Human atrial I(to1) is rate-independent at physiological rates unlike in rabbits, suggesting it contributes importantly to atrial repolarization at all physiological heart rates in humans.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 88.8% vs 3.4%

Abstract

Both human and rabbit atrial cells possess a large 4-aminopyridine-sensitive transient outward current (I(to1)). However, the slow reactivation of this current in rabbits suggests that its role may be limited to very slow heart rates. We used whole cell voltage-clamp recordings to evaluate the rate dependency of I(to1) in rabbit and human atrial myocytes. Our results show that at physiological temperatures in human atrium, I(to1) is rate independent at rates between 0.1 and 4.0 Hz. Peak I(to1) at 4.0 Hz in rabbit was 3.4 +/- 1.4% (mean +/- SE) of current at 0.1 Hz (P 0.05, n = 7). These differences were due to marked discrepancies in reactivation time course, which was biexponential with time constants that averaged 650 +/- 159 ms and 8.4 +/- 1.1 s in rabbit (n = 8) compared with a single exponential time constant of 33.6 +/- 6.8 ms (n = 8) in human atrium (both at 30 degrees C). These findings suggest that I(to1) can contribute importantly to atrial repolarization at all physiological heart rates in humans. Furthermore, these results emphasize that there are important interspecies variations in the rate dependence of I(to1), which need to be considered in understanding the physiological and pharmacological regulation of atrial repolarization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fermini et al. (1992) studied Atrial repolarization (n=15). Human atrial myocytes vs. Rabbit atrial myocytes was evaluated on Peak I(to1) at 4.0 Hz as a percentage of current at 0.1 Hz. Human atrial I(to1) is rate-independent at physiological rates (88.8% of peak at 4.0 Hz vs 0.1 Hz), unlike in rabbits (3.4%), due to a much faster reactivation time course.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a14750e219f8cdd346c53https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1992.263.6.h1747
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Potential Molecular Basis of Different Physiological Properties of the Transient Outward K<sup>+</sup>Current in Rabbit and Human Atrial Myocytes1999 · 203 citations
  2. 2Role of chloride currents in repolarizing rabbit atrial myocytes1995 · 31 citations
  3. 3Comparative mechanisms of 4-aminopyridine-resistant Ito in human and rabbit atrial myocytes1995 · 56 citations
  4. 4Comparison of potassium currents in rabbit atrial and ventricular cells.1988 · 386 citations
  5. 5Characterisation of the transient outward K+ current in rabbit sinoatrial node cells2000 · 62 citations