Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows slightly higher long-term adverse events but comparable mortality with adjunctive coronary endarterectomy in diffuse coronary disease, suggesting it remains an acceptable surgical option.
Objectives: To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of coronary endarterectomy (CE) as an adjunct to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with CABG alone in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: Postoperative complications, in-hospital and long-term mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were compared between 702 patients undergoing CE + CABG and 2808 propensity score-matched patients undergoing CABG alone at Tehran Heart Center between 2007 and 2016 and during a median follow-up of 98.6 months (96% confidence interval [CI], 97-99.9 months). Among short-term complications, pericardial involvement was more common in the CE + CABG group, but there were no significant differences in rates of cerebrovascular events, cardiac arrest, and infective complications. Despite comparable long-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.93-1.31), patients undergoing CE + CABG had slightly higher rates of MACCE in their long-term follow-up (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33). Conclusions: Despite higher rates of short-term morbidity and mortality, CE + CABG, if performed after meticulous patient selection and by experienced surgeons, could be an acceptable approach with favorable long-term outcomes in patients with diffuse CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bagheri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: