Key result
CABG with coronary endarterectomy was associated with increased 30-day mortality compared to isolated CABG (RR 1.87; 95% CI 1.73-2.07; p<0.01), but 5-year survival was similar.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting with coronary endarterectomy compared with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
Does coronary artery bypass grafting with coronary endarterectomy improve outcomes compared to isolated CABG in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=114,319)
Does coronary artery bypass grafting with coronary endarterectomy improve outcomes compared to isolated CABG in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease?
Relative Risk: 1.87 (95% CI 1.73–2.07)
p-value: p=< 0.01
CABG with coronary endarterectomy carries higher short-term risks including mortality and myocardial infarction compared to isolated CABG, but yields similar 5-year survival.
Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with coronary endarterectomy (CE) versus isolated CABG. Methods: Studies evaluating outcomes of CABG with CE (CE-CABG) were searched from 1 January 2000 to 30 September 2022, on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The primary outcome was 30 -days mortality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative myocardial infraction, low output syndrome, cardiac arrhythmia, renal dysfunction, and 5 years survival. Results: A total of 12 observational studies including 114,319 patients assessing CE-CABG ( n = 35,174) versus isolated CABG ( n = 79,145) were included. Compared to isolated CABG alone, CE-CABG was significantly associated with increased incidences of 30-days mortality (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.73–2.07; p < 0.01), postoperative myocardial infraction (RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.26–2.05; p < 0.01), low output syndrome (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.17–2.02; p < 0.01), and renal dysfunction (RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.44–1.69; p < 0.01). However, there was no difference in either rate of cardiac arrhythmia (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.97–1.15; p = 0.20) or 5 years survival (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.95–1.16; p = 0.34) between the CE-CABG group and the control group. Subgroup analysis on CE technique showed that CE-CABG was also associated with 30 days mortality in patients undergoing closed CE (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.09–2.03), whereas this association between CE and 30 days mortality was not observed in patients undergoing open CE (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 0.58–5.32). Conclusions: Despite poor short-term outcomes, CE-CABG appeared to offer satisfactory long-term survival in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Diffuse coronary artery disease (n=114,319). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with coronary endarterectomy (CE) vs. Isolated CABG was evaluated on 30-days mortality (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.73-2.07, p=< 0.01). CABG with coronary endarterectomy was associated with increased 30-day mortality compared to isolated CABG (RR 1.87; 95% CI 1.73-2.07; p<0.01), but 5-year survival was similar.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: