Key result
Concomitant coronary endarterectomy with CABG yields comparable mid-term survival to CABG alone.
Why the study?
Coronary endarterectomy enables reconstruction in diffuse coronary artery disease when standard distal anastomosis is unfeasible, but its impact remains debated.
Does concomitant coronary endarterectomy with CABG improve outcomes compared to CABG-only in patients undergoing CABG?
Cohort (n=406)
No
Does concomitant coronary endarterectomy with CABG improve outcomes compared to CABG-only in patients undergoing CABG?
p-value: p=0.289
Selective coronary endarterectomy with CABG yields comparable early and mid-term outcomes to CABG-only, with higher risk concentrated in women, older patients, and those with renal or peripheral vascular disease.
Supports selective coronary endarterectomy with CABG in suitable patients; leaves open need for randomized trials to confirm outcomes.
Background: Complete revascularization in diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD) is challenging when target vessels are small and circumferentially diseased. Coronary endarterectomy (CE) can enable reconstruction where a standard distal anastomosis is not feasible, but its impact remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of concomitant CE with CABG on the mid-term outcomes and explored the potential risk factors for adverse events. Methods: Single-centre retrospective cohort (2017–2022) of patients undergoing CABG with or without CE (n=406; CE n=97, CABG-only n=309). The prespecified primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction) assessed in-hospital/30 days and up to 72 months. CE-subgroup risk modelling used Firth-penalised logistic regression. Effects were summarized as odds ratio (95% CIs); time-to-event analyses used Kaplan–Meier. Results: Early peri-operative MI and in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between groups. Over 72 months, overall survival was similar (log-rank P=0.289). Within the CE cohort, mid-term MI (1.0%) and stroke (2.1%) were infrequent. In multivariable CE-subgroup modelling, female sex, renal impairment, peripheral vascular disease, and age ≥65 were independently associated with complications; with female sex demonstrating the strongest association. Conclusions: Selective CE with CABG yielded comparable early and mid-term outcomes to CABG-only, with low mid-term complication rates. Risk was concentrated among women, patients with renal impairment or peripheral vascular disease, and those ≥65 years, supporting heightened peri-operative vigilance and tailored follow-up in these subgroups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Diffuse coronary artery disease (n=406). Coronary endarterectomy (CE) with CABG vs. CABG-only was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction) assessed in-hospital/30 days and up to 72 months (p=0.289). Concomitant coronary endarterectomy with CABG yielded comparable early and mid-term overall survival to CABG-only (log-rank P=0.289), with low mid-term complication rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: