Key result
Heart failure home hospitalization platform achieves a sufficient professional usability score of ~72.
Why the study?
Heart failure is a common cause of mortality and rehospitalizations, prompting the need to explore healthcare professionals' perceived usability of a digital health platform supporting hospitalizations at home.
Is a digital health platform usable by healthcare professionals to support home hospitalization in heart failure patients?
Is a digital health platform usable by healthcare professionals to support home hospitalization in heart failure patients?
A digital health platform to support home hospitalization for heart failure patients was considered usable by healthcare professionals, though actual use was limited, highlighting the need for better clinical workflow integration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform development of home HF hospitalization tools; leaves open effects of workflow integration on adoption.
AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is a common cause of mortality and (re)hospitalizations. The NWE-Chance project explored the feasibility of providing hospitalizations at home (HH) supported by a newly developed digital health platform. The aim of this study was to explore the perceived usability by healthcare professionals (HCPs) of a digital platform in addition to HH for HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective, international, multicentre, single-arm interventional study was conducted. Sixty-three patients and 22 HCPs participated. The HH consisted of daily home visits by the nurse and use of the platform, consisting of a portable blood pressure device, weight scale, pulse oximeter, a wearable chest patch to measure vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, activity level, and posture), and an eCoach for the patient. Primary outcome was usability of the platform measured by the System Usability Scale halfway and at the end of the study. Overall usability was rated as sufficient (mean score 72.1 ± 8.9) and did not differ between the measurements moments (P = 0.690). The HCPs reported positive experiences (n = 7), negative experiences (n = 13), and recommendations (n = 6) for the future. Actual use of the platform was 79% of the HH days. CONCLUSION: A digital health platform to support HH was considered usable by HCPs, although actual use of the platform was limited. Therefore, several improvements in the integration of the digital platform into clinical workflows and in defining the precise role of the digital platform and its use are needed to add value before full implementation. REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04084964.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leenen et al. (2023) studied Heart failure (n=85). Digital health platform supporting hospitalizations at home was evaluated on Usability of the platform measured by the System Usability Scale halfway and at the end of the study (p=0.690). A digital health platform supporting home hospitalization for heart failure patients was rated as having sufficient usability by healthcare professionals.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: