Key result
Initially failed RF ablation shows delayed efficacy for ventricular arrhythmias, allowing postponed ICD implantation.
Why the study?
Does waiting for delayed efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation suppress ventricular arrhythmias and avoid immediate ICD implantation in patients with arrhythmias originating in the interventricular basal septum?
Does waiting for delayed efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation suppress ventricular arrhythmias and avoid immediate ICD implantation in patients with arrhythmias originating in the interventricular basal septum?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Waiting for delayed efficacy after a failed radiofrequency ablation for septal ventricular arrhythmias may suppress the arrhythmia and avoid unnecessary ICD implantation.
Delayed efficacy of radiofrequency energy can suppress ventricular arrhythmias after a failed ablation procedure. The implant of cardiac defibrillator for arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy should be procrastinated after a period of follow-up. Waiting for delayed efficacy is a reasonable choice to reduce the risk of complications associated with aggressive ablative approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mariani et al. (2019) studied this question. Radiofrequency catheter ablation can exhibit delayed efficacy to suppress ventricular arrhythmias after a failed procedure, allowing the postponement of cardiac defibrillator implantation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: