Key result
18FDG-PET/CT provides ~95% negative predictive value for excluding pericardial malignancy and guides higher-yield biopsies.
Why the study?
Pericardial disease diagnosis is often challenging because pericardial fluid analysis or biopsy does not always provide answers, whereas 18FDG-PET/CT can visualize inflammation and malignancy.
Does 18FDG-PET/CT improve the differential diagnosis of pericardial disease in patients with unclear etiology?
Observational (n=107)
No
Does 18FDG-PET/CT improve the differential diagnosis of pericardial disease in patients with unclear etiology?
18FDG-PET/CT provides a high negative predictive value (94.5%) for excluding malignancy in pericardial disease and can guide targeted biopsies to improve diagnostic yield.
May support 18FDG-PET/CT for malignancy exclusion in pericardial disease; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
This study aimed to assess the role of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 FDG-PET/CT) in the differential diagnosis of pericardial disease. The diagnosis is often troublesome because pericardial fluid analysis or biopsy does not always provide answers. 18 FDG-PET/CT can visualize both inflammation and malignancy and offers a whole-body assessment. Patients who visited the Pericardial Disease Clinic of Samsung Medical Center with an 18 FDG-PET/CT order code were extracted. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the purpose of the differential diagnosis was not pericardial disease; (2) the patient had a known advanced-stage malignancy; (3) the patient already have confirmative diagnosis using a serology, pericardial effusion analysis or biopsy. The analysis included 107 patients. The most common final diagnosis was idiopathic (n = 46, 43.0%), followed by tuberculosis (n = 30, 28.0%) and neoplastic (n = 11, 10.3%). A maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ≥ 5 typically indicates tuberculosis or neoplastic pericarditis except in just one case of autoimmune pericarditis); especially all of the SUVmax scores ≥ 10 had tuberculosis. The diagnostic yield of pericardial biopsy was very low (10.2%). Interestingly, all of the pericardium with an SUVmax < 4.4 had nondiagnostic results. In contrast, targeted biopsies based on 18 FDG uptake demonstrated a higher diagnostic yield (38.7%) than pericardium. The sensitivity of 18 FDG-PET/CT was 63.6%. The specificity was 71.9%. The positive predictive value was 20.6%. The negative predictive value 94.5%, and the accuracy was 71.0% for excluding malignancy based upon the FDG uptake patterns. It is possible to explore the differential diagnosis in some patients with difficult pericardiocentesis or pericardial biopsy in a noninvasive manner using on the SUVmax or uptake patterns. In addition, the biopsy strategy depending on 18 FDG uptake is helpful to achieve biopsy more safely and with a higher yield. 18 FDG-PET may enhance the diagnostic efficacy in patients with pericardial disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyeon et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Pericardial disease (n=107). 18FDG-PET/CT vs. Pericardial biopsy was evaluated on Accuracy for excluding malignancy based upon FDG uptake patterns. 18FDG-PET/CT demonstrated a 94.5% negative predictive value for excluding malignancy in pericardial disease and guided targeted biopsies with a higher diagnostic yield (38.7%) than pericardial biopsies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: