Key result
Current prognostic models for stable CAD lack a unified approach to CV risk stratification.
Why the study?
Although management of stable coronary artery disease depends on prognosis and many prognostic models and scores exist, there is currently no unified approach for cardiovascular risk stratification.
This review highlights the lack of a unified approach for cardiovascular risk stratification in stable coronary artery disease despite the availability of numerous prognostic models.
No unified score recommended for stable CAD; leaves open consensus development and prospective validation.
According to modern clinical guidelines, the strategy of examination and treatment of a patient with stable coronary artery disease depends on the prognosis. Despite the great number of prognostic models and scores, there is currently no unified approach for cardiovascular risk stratification. The article provides a literature review of the main current prognostic models and scores, taking into account their effectiveness and limitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Толпыгина et al. (2020) conducted a review in stable coronary artery disease. prognostic models and scores was evaluated. Prognostic models and scores for stable coronary artery disease lack a unified approach for cardiovascular risk stratification despite the great number of available tools.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: