Key result
AI and ML rapidly advance PPG-based AF detection across 57 recent studies.
Why the study?
More advanced technologies in PPG-based AF detection utilizing digital health and artificial intelligence have emerged since June 2019, warranting an updated review.
This comprehensive review highlights the rapid advancement and growing application of AI and digital health solutions in PPG-based atrial fibrillation detection.
Objective. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia associated with significant health ramifications, including an elevated susceptibility to ischemic stroke, heart disease, and heightened mortality. Photoplethysmography (PPG) has emerged as a promising technology for continuous AF monitoring for its cost-effectiveness and widespread integration into wearable devices. Our team previously conducted an exhaustive review on PPG-based AF detection before June 2019. However, since then, more advanced technologies have emerged in this field. Approach. This paper offers a comprehensive review of the latest advancements in PPG-based AF detection, utilizing digital health and artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, within the timeframe spanning from July 2019 to December 2022. Through extensive exploration of scientific databases, we have identified 57 pertinent studies. Significance. Our comprehensive review encompasses an in-depth assessment of the statistical methodologies, traditional machine learning techniques, and deep learning approaches employed in these studies. In addition, we address the challenges encountered in the domain of PPG-based AF detection. Furthermore, we maintain a dedicated website to curate the latest research in this area, with regular updates on a regular basis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2024) studied this question. Photoplethysmography-based atrial fibrillation detection using artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches has rapidly advanced across 57 recent studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: