PPG features derived from wavelet scattering transform combined with a support vector machine classified normotension and prehypertension with an accuracy of 71.42% and an F1-score of 76%.
Does combining PPG features extracted via wavelet scattering transform with clinical data improve the detection of early hypertension stages compared to separate analysis?
A machine learning approach using wavelet scattering transform on PPG signals can detect prehypertension with moderate accuracy, but adding clinical variables does not improve performance.
Effect estimate: F1-score 76%
High blood pressure early screening remains a challenge due to the lack of symptoms associated with it. Accordingly, noninvasive methods based on photoplethysmography (PPG) or clinical data analysis and the training of machine learning techniques for hypertension detection have been proposed in the literature. Nevertheless, several challenges arise when analyzing PPG signals, such as the need for high-quality signals for morphological feature extraction from PPG related to high blood pressure. On the other hand, another popular approach is to use deep learning techniques to avoid the feature extraction process. Nonetheless, this method requires high computational power and behaves as a black-box approach, which impedes application in a medical context. In addition, considering only the socio-demographic and clinical data of the subject does not allow constant monitoring. This work proposes to use the wavelet scattering transform as a feature extraction technique to obtain features from PPG data and combine it with clinical data to detect early hypertension stages by applying Early and Late Fusion. This analysis showed that the PPG features derived from the wavelet scattering transform combined with a support vector machine can classify normotension and prehypertension with an accuracy of 71.42% and an F1-score of 76%. However, classifying normotension and prehypertension by considering both the features extracted from PPG signals through wavelet scattering transform and clinical variables such as age, body mass index, and heart rate by either Late Fusion or Early Fusion did not provide better performance than considering each data type separately in terms of accuracy and F1-score.
Martinez-Ríos et al. (Sat,) conducted a other in Hypertension. Wavelet scattering transform of PPG data with support vector machine vs. Combined PPG and clinical data (Early/Late Fusion) was evaluated on Classification of normotension and prehypertension (F1-score 76%). PPG features derived from wavelet scattering transform combined with a support vector machine classified normotension and prehypertension with an accuracy of 71.42% and an F1-score of 76%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: