Why the study?
Long-term abnormal blood pressure can lead to cardiovascular diseases, making assessment of blood pressure status significant as a preventative measure.
Does a feature-extraction-based approach using PPG signals accurately assess hypertension status?
Does a feature-extraction-based approach using PPG signals accurately assess hypertension status?
A feature-extraction approach using PPG signals and support vector machine classification shows potential for accurate, non-invasive hypertension assessment.
Objective. Long-term abnormal blood pressure (BP) can lead to various cardiovascular diseases; therefore, it is significant to assess BP status as a preventative measure. In this study, a feature-extraction-based approach is proposed and performed on an open clinical trial dataset. Approach. Firstly, a complete ensemble of empirical mode decomposition with an adaptive noise algorithm and wavelet threshold analysis is applied to eliminate the noise interference from an original photoplethysmography (PPG) signal compared to other signal filters. Considering the strong connection between hypertension and diabetes, an analysis of variance test with a 95% confidence interval is firstly carried out to select these leading extracted morphological features, which are uniquely related to hypertension, from the PPG signal and its derivatives. Subsequently a variety of classification models are evaluated at different BP levels and their performances are compared. Main results and Significance. The test results demonstrate that the support vector machine classification model achieves a greater performance compared to other explored models in this paper, with accuracy of 78%, 87% and 88% for cases including normal versus prehypertension subjects, normotension versus hypertension subjects and non-hypertension versus hypertension subjects, respectively, which further illustrates the great potential of the proposed method in hypertension assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu Wei-zhang (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: