Why the study?
Traditional preclinical predictions of drug-induced QT prolongation and arrhythmic risk often rely on small, healthy cohorts, excluding vulnerable populations.
Can in silico computational models of healthy and diseased hearts predict variability in drug-induced QT prolongation and arrhythmic risk across different pathologies and sexes?
Can in silico computational models of healthy and diseased hearts predict variability in drug-induced QT prolongation and arrhythmic risk across different pathologies and sexes?
Computational cardiac models can successfully capture disease- and sex-specific differences in drug-induced proarrhythmic risk, offering a promising tool for preclinical safety evaluations.
Supports in silico models for pathology- and sex-specific arrhythmic risk; leaves open human translation from animal data.
This study evaluates virtual cardiac populations for preclinical assessment of drug-induced QT interval prolongation and arrhythmic risk. Traditional predictions often rely on small, healthy cohorts, excluding vulnerable populations. Using computational models of realistic heart anatomies and electrophysiology, we generated a virtual cohort of 512 subjects across healthy and diseased hearts (heart failure, dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, ischaemia, and myocardial infarction). We assessed QT prolongation and arrhythmic events following administration of moxifloxacin (benchmark antibiotic) and contraindicated drugs including quinidine, bepridil, and flecainide. Patients with heart failure, hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy showed greater QT prolongation to moxifloxacin, unlike ischaemia and myocardial infarction, which resembled healthy subjects. Females exhibited consistently higher QT prolongation than males. Contraindicated drugs markedly increased arrhythmia risk in populations with heart failure, dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and ischaemia, frequently leading to lethal arrhythmias such as Torsades des Pointes or ventricular fibrillation, particularly in females. These findings demonstrate that computational models capture variability in drug response across pathologies and sexes, offering a predictive framework for preclinical safety evaluations and supporting safer, more personalized drug development strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dominguez-Gomez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: