Editorial examines research quality issues in the LIS profession, highlighting systemic shifts and implications.
This editorial critically examines the contemporary state of research within the Library and Information Science (LIS) profession in India, highlighting a systemic shift from genuine intellectual inquiry to credential-driven compliance. Historically, as evidenced by a 2001 ICSSR/NASSDOC directory showing that 93% of institutional librarians lacked a Ph.D., doctoral degrees were not mandatory for career progression. Today, however, rigid institutional mandates—such as those from the University Grants Commission (UGC)—have turned the Ph.D. into a compulsory tool for promotion, leading to an influx of repetitive, unoriginal, and low-quality theses. The author argues that this focus on degree attainment has eroded the true culture of research, stifling the potential of a highly IT-skilled younger generation who often lack original research agendas or able mentorship. To rectify this, the paper proposes that "good research" must be distinguished by its wider real-world applicability and its capacity to yield at least two high-quality peer-reviewed journal articles, ultimately urging regulatory bodies like the UGC to urgently implement stricter, more meaningful guidelines to restore academic rigor to the profession.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siddhartha Shankar Ray (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: