Key result
Leadless WiSE-CRT improves NYHA functional score and boosts LVEF by ~6% in heart failure patients.
Why the study?
CRT improves outcomes in HFrEF but faces challenges such as unsuccessful lead placement and suboptimal responses, which leadless LV endocardial pacing via the WiSE-CRT system may help address.
Does the WiSE-CRT system improve functional class, echocardiographic parameters, and QRS duration in patients with heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=468)
Does the WiSE-CRT system improve functional class, echocardiographic parameters, and QRS duration in patients with heart failure?
Effect estimate: MD -0.44 (95% CI -0.67 to -0.21)
p-value: p=0.0002
Leadless ultrasound-based LV endocardial pacing (WiSE-CRT) significantly improves LVEF, LV volumes, QRS duration, and NYHA class in heart failure patients, offering a promising alternative for those ineligible for or non-responsive to conventional CRT.
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes but faces challenges such as unsuccessful lead placement and suboptimal responses. The Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) system, a novel leadless left ventricular (LV) pacing technology, uses ultrasonic energy to deliver electrical stimulation directly to the LV endocardium, potentially improving the response rates. A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple databases from inception until August 2024. The outcomes of interest included the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional score, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and QRS duration. Statistical analysis involved pooling the mean differences (MDs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each study using the inverse-variance random-effects model in RevMan version 5.4.1 software. Seven studies, including 468 patients with heart failure treated with the WiSE-CRT system, were included. The pooled analysis showed significant improvements in NYHA functional score (MD: -0.44; 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.21; P = 0.0002; I2 = 77%), LVEF (MD: 5.71; 95% CI: 4.54 to 6.87; P < 0.001), LVEDV (MD: -24.49; 95% CI: -33.24 to -15.73; P < 0.001), and LVESV (MD: -24.47; 95% CI: -32.80 to -16.14; P < 0.001). The QRS duration also decreased significantly (MD: -38.62; 95% CI: -46.76 to -30.49; P < 0.001; I2 = 60%). The WiSE-CRT system significantly improved NYHA functional score, LVEF, QRS duration, LVEDV, and LVESV in patients with heart failure. This leadless pacing technology offers a promising alternative for ineligible candidates or for those who do not respond to conventional CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jain et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=468). Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) system was evaluated on New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional score (MD -0.44, 95% CI -0.67 to -0.21, p=0.0002). The leadless WiSE-CRT system significantly improved NYHA functional score (MD -0.44; 95% CI -0.67 to -0.21; P=0.0002) and LVEF (MD 5.71; 95% CI 4.54 to 6.87; P<0.001) in heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: