Key result
PCI linked to ~50% higher mortality versus CABG in left main coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
Outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease required evaluation in a nationwide all-comers setting.
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve mortality and MACCE compared to coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=11,137)
Yes
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve mortality and MACCE compared to coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease?
In a nationwide Swedish registry of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease, CABG was associated with significantly lower mortality and MACCE compared to PCI, with a particularly pronounced survival benefit in patients with diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support CABG preference in left main disease; leaves open confirmation by contemporary randomized trials.
AIMS: An observational nationwide all-comers prospective register study to analyse outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients undergoing coronary angiography in Sweden are registered in the Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies registry. Between 01/01/2005 and 12/31/2015, 11 137 patients with LMCA disease underwent CABG (n = 9364) or PCI (n = 1773). Patients with previous CABG, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) or cardiac shock were excluded. Death, MI, stroke, and new revascularization during follow-up until 12/31/2015 were identified using national registries. Cox regression with inverse probability weighting (IPW) and an instrumental variable (IV), administrative region, were used. Patients undergoing PCI were older, had higher prevalence of comorbidity but lower prevalence of three-vessel disease. PCI patients had higher mortality than CABG patients after adjustments for known cofounders with IPW analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-2.7]) and known/unknown confounders with IV analysis (HR 1.5 [95% CI 1.1-2.0]). PCI was associated with higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; death, MI, stroke, or new revascularization) than CABG, with IV analysis (HR 2.8 [95% CI 1.8-4.5]). There was a quantitative interaction for diabetic status regarding mortality (P = 0.014) translating into 3.6 years (95% CI 3.3-4.0) longer median survival time favouring CABG in patients with diabetes. CONCLUSION: In this non-randomized study, CABG in patients with LMCA disease was associated with lower mortality and fewer MACCE compared to PCI after multivariable adjustment for known and unknown confounders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Persson et al. (2023) conducted an observational in unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease (n=11,137). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was evaluated on mortality (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0). In patients with left main coronary artery disease, PCI was associated with higher mortality (HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.0) and MACCE (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.8-4.5) compared to CABG.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: