Key result
Diabetes in patients with transmural acute myocardial infarction was associated with a significantly higher risk of cardiogenic shock compared to non-diabetics (RR 3.1; 95% CI 1.2-8.1).
Why the study?
Does diabetes mellitus increase the extent of coronary artery disease and the risk of cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=176)
Does diabetes mellitus increase the extent of coronary artery disease and the risk of cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction have a significantly higher risk of cardiogenic shock, which does not appear to be explained solely by differences in the prevalence of extensive coronary artery disease as assessed by ECG.
Diabetes may heighten cardiogenic shock risk after transmural MI beyond ECG CAD extent; leaves open mechanisms and intervention targets.
In 91 non-diabetics (age 63 +/- 12, mean +/- SD, years range 31-94 years) and 85 patients with known diabetes or clearly abnormal levels of HbA1c (age 66 +/- 10 years, range 36-87 years) electrocardiograms were analysed sequentially after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). There was no significant difference in infarct site between the two groups. Generalized ischaemic change without ST elevation was seen in 33% of diabetics and 22% of non-diabetics (p greater than 0.1). In patients with transmural AMI, cardiogenic shock (CGS) was significantly commoner in diabetics (relative risk 3.1, CL 1.2-8.1) but there was no difference in the frequency of reciprocal change between the two groups. In both diabetic and non-diabetic patients the development of cardiogenic shock was more frequently associated with the presence of reciprocal change, the difference reaching significance in the diabetic group (chi 2 = 4.4, p less than 0.05). Thus cardiogenic shock in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients with AMI may be associated with the presence of extensive coronary artery disease, but differences in the prevalence of extensive disease do not explain the predisposition of diabetic patients to CGS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oswald et al. (1986) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=176). Diabetes vs. Non-diabetics was evaluated on Cardiogenic shock in patients with transmural AMI (RR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-8.1). Diabetes in patients with transmural acute myocardial infarction was associated with a significantly higher risk of cardiogenic shock compared to non-diabetics (RR 3.1; 95% CI 1.2-8.1).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: