Key result
Evaluation of a coding framework in the English Hospital Episode Statistics database showed high consistency, with 94.9% of 20,290 AAA replacement patients having a consistent diagnosis code.
Why the study?
Does a proposed coding framework accurately identify homogeneous groups of patients undergoing AAA surgery in the English HES database?
Observational (n=20,290)
Yes
Does a proposed coding framework accurately identify homogeneous groups of patients undergoing AAA surgery in the English HES database?
A proposed coding framework using the English HES database demonstrates high consistency in identifying homogeneous groups of patients undergoing AAA surgery.
Supports reliable HES-based AAA surgery research; extends validation of coding frameworks for administrative database studies.
Background A coding framework was evaluated to study patients undergoing open surgical replacement of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database. The objective was to create groups of patients who are homogeneous with respect to diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Methods The frequency and consistency of potentially relevant diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision) and procedure (Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Classification, 4th revision) codes were assessed in patients admitted to English National Health Service hospitals between April 2003 and March 2008. Administrative codes were compared with diagnosis and procedure codes to check that patients who had undergone emergency surgery for a ruptured AAA were admitted as an emergency. Results Of 20 290 patients undergoing AAA replacement, 19 250 (94·9 per cent) had a consistent diagnosis (unruptured or ruptured AAA); 79·3 per cent of patients with an emergency replacement were coded as having a ruptured AAA and 95·7 per cent of those with a non-emergency replacement as having an unruptured AAA. Of patients who had undergone emergency replacement of a ruptured AAA, 93·3 per cent were coded as having been admitted as an emergency. Conclusion Coding consistency was high. The proposed framework could define homogeneous groups by combining diagnosis, procedure and administrative codes. It also allows an assessment of potential miscoding at national and hospital level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johal et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=20,290). Coding framework evaluation was evaluated on Coding consistency of diagnosis and procedure codes. Evaluation of a coding framework in the English Hospital Episode Statistics database showed high consistency, with 94.9% of 20,290 AAA replacement patients having a consistent diagnosis code.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: