Key result
IV acetazolamide improves ADHF decongestion despite a ~114% higher rate of transient worsening renal function.
Why the study?
Whether the beneficial decongestive effects of acetazolamide in acute decompensated heart failure are consistent across the entire range of renal function remained unclear.
Does intravenous acetazolamide improve decongestion and affect renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure across different baseline eGFR levels?
Population
519 patients with ADHF
Comparison
Intravenous acetazolamide vs matching placebo on top of intravenous loop diuretics
Design
Pre-specified analysis of a randomized trial
Follow-up
3 months
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“suggest the use of acetazolamide as a reasonable adjunct to achieving more rapid decongestion”
“some limitations to the study include the lack of non-white participants, which may limit the generalizability of the results to other racial or ethnic groups”
Acetazolamide may aid decongestion across eGFR spectrum with amplified natriuresis at low eGFR; leaves open net benefit given higher WRF risk.
RCT (n=519)
Does intravenous acetazolamide improve decongestion and affect renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure across different baseline eGFR levels?
Absolute Event Rate: 40.5% vs 18.9%
p-value: p=< .001
Acetazolamide improves decongestion in acute decompensated heart failure across all ranges of baseline renal function, and although it increases the risk of transient worsening renal function, this does not worsen clinical outcomes.
Meekers et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) (n=519). intravenous acetazolamide vs. matching placebo was evaluated on worsening renal function (WRF; rise in creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL) during the treatment period (p=< .001). Intravenous acetazolamide improved decongestion across all renal function ranges in ADHF, despite a higher incidence of transient worsening renal function (40.5% vs. 18.9%; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: