Key result
TRS-HF DM score discriminates heart failure events in type 2 diabetes with a 0.78 C-index.
Why the study?
To investigate the ability of the TRS-HF DM to stratify patients with T2DM and high cardiovascular risk for HF hospitalization.
Does the TRS-HF DM risk score accurately predict the risk of HF hospitalization or death due to HF in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Cohort (n=5,123)
Does the TRS-HF DM risk score accurately predict the risk of HF hospitalization or death due to HF in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Effect estimate: C-index 0.78
p-value: p=0.13
The TRS-HF DM risk score accurately discriminates heart failure-specific risk among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, which may help identify patients who would benefit most from HF risk-reducing therapies.
Supports TRS-HF DM for HF risk stratification in T2DM; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact.
Aim To investigate the ability of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Heart Failure in Diabetes (TRS‐HF DM ) to stratify patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and high cardiovascular risk for heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Materials and Methods We used data from the control group of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group (ACCORD) trial (n = 5123; mean follow‐up 4.8 years). The TRS‐HF DM includes: prior HF (2 points), atrial fibrillation (1 point), coronary artery disease (1 point), estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (1 point), and urine albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio (>300 mg/g: 2 points; 30–300 mg/g: 1 point). We evaluated the discrimination (Harrell's C‐index) and calibration (Nam‐D'Agostino calibration statistic) of the TRS‐HF DM with regard to time to HF hospitalization or death due to HF. Results The mean age of the participants was 62.8 ± 6.6 years, and 38% were women. The prevalences of TRS‐HF DM 0, 1, 2, 3 and ≥4 were 42.1%, 34.9%, 14.6%, 6.0% and 2.5%, respectively. Increasing TRS‐HF DM corresponded to an increasing HF risk: 1.3 per 1000 person‐years for a TRS‐HF DM of 0 to 64.7 per 1000 person‐years for TRS‐HF DM of ≥4. The TRS‐HF DM demonstrated robust discrimination of HF outcomes (C‐index 0.78). Furthermore, the score was well calibrated for HF outcomes (calibration statistic P = 0.13). Similar results were seen in participants without baseline HF (C‐index 0.75). Conclusion The TRS‐HF DM discriminates HF‐specific risk among people with T2DM. The use of TRS‐HF DM to identify those who would maximally benefit from therapies that reduce HF risk warrants evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elharram et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and high cardiovascular risk (n=5,123). Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Heart Failure in Diabetes (TRS-HF DM) was evaluated on Time to HF hospitalization or death due to HF (C-index 0.78, p=0.13). The TRS-HF DM risk score effectively discriminated heart failure hospitalization or death in type 2 diabetes (C-index 0.78), with risk ranging from 1.3 to 64.7 per 1000 person-years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: