Key result
HBPM shows high specificity but poor sensitivity vs ABPM for diagnosing white-coat and masked hypertension.
Why the study?
Does home blood pressure monitoring accurately diagnose white-coat and masked hypertension compared to 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,774)
Yes
Does home blood pressure monitoring accurately diagnose white-coat and masked hypertension compared to 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?
Home blood pressure monitoring has high specificity but low sensitivity for diagnosing white-coat and masked hypertension, suggesting it should complement rather than replace ambulatory monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution against sole reliance on home monitoring to exclude phenotypes; leaves open optimal integration with ambulatory monitoring in diagnostic algorithms.
BACKGROUND: We investigated accuracy of home blood pressure (BP) monitoring in the diagnosis of white-coat and masked hypertension in comparison with ambulatory BP monitoring. METHODS: Our study participants were enrolled in the China Ambulatory and Home BP Registry, and underwent clinic, home, and 24-h ambulatory BP measurements. We defined white-coat hypertension as an elevated clinic SBP/DBP (≥140/90 mmHg) and a normal 24-h ambulatory (<130/80 mmHg) or home SBP/DBP (<135/85 mmHg), and masked hypertension as a normal clinic SBP/DBP (<140/90 mmHg) and an elevated 24-h ambulatory (≥130/80 mmHg) or home SBP/DBP (≥135/85 mmHg). RESULTS: In untreated patients (n = 573), the prevalence of white-coat hypertension (13.1 vs. 19.9%), masked hypertension (17.8 vs. 13.1%), and sustained hypertension (46.4 vs. 39.6%) significantly (P ≤ 0.02) differed between 24-h ambulatory and home BP monitoring. In treated patients (n = 1201), only the prevalence of masked hypertension differed significantly (18.7 vs. 14.5%; P = 0.005). Regardless of the treatment status, home compared with 24-h ambulatory BP had low sensitivity (range 47-74%), but high specificity (86-94%), and accordingly low positive (41-87%), but high negative predictive values (80-94%), and had moderate diagnostic agreement (82-85%) and Kappa statistic (0.41-0.66). In untreated and treated patients, age advancing was associated with a higher prevalence of white-coat hypertension and a lower prevalence of masked hypertension defined by 24-h ambulatory (P ≤ 0.03) but not home BP (P ≥ 0.10). CONCLUSION: Home BP monitoring has high specificity, but low sensitivity in the diagnosis of white-coat and masked hypertension, and may therefore behave as a complementary to, but not a replacement of, ambulatory BP monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in White-coat and masked hypertension (n=1,774). Home blood pressure monitoring vs. 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for white-coat and masked hypertension. Home blood pressure monitoring demonstrated high specificity (86-94%) but low sensitivity (47-74%) for diagnosing white-coat and masked hypertension compared with 24-h ambulatory monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: