PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 29, 2009Hypertension307 citationsOpen Access

Long-Term Risk of Sustained Hypertension in White-Coat or Masked Hypertension

View Full Paper
GMGiuseppe ManciaMBMichele BombelliRFRita Facchetti

Key Result

White-coat and masked hypertension significantly increased the 10-year risk of developing sustained hypertension compared with normotension (OR 2.51 and 1.78, respectively; P<0.0001).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,412)

Structured PICO

Does white-coat or masked hypertension increase the risk of developing sustained hypertension compared to normotension?

P
Population
1,412 subjects from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni Study, including normotensive, white-coat hypertension, masked hypertension, and sustained hypertension groups.
I
Intervention
White-coat hypertension (WCHT) or masked hypertension (MHT)
C
Comparator
Normotension
O
Outcome
Development of sustained hypertensive state (SHT) at 10 yearssurrogate

Subjects with white-coat and masked hypertension are at significantly higher risk of progressing to sustained hypertension over 10 years compared to normotensive individuals.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 2.51 and 1.78

Absolute Event Rate: 42.6% vs 18.2%

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

It is debated whether white-coat (WCHT) and masked hypertension (MHT) are at greater risk of developing a sustained hypertensive state (SHT). In 1412 subjects of the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni Study, we measured office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP, and home BP. The condition of WCHT was identified as office BP >140/90 mm Hg and 24-hour BP mean or =125/79 mm Hg, and home BP >or =132/82 mm Hg. SHT was identified when both office and 24-hour BP means or home BP were over threshold values and normotension was under the threshold value. Subjects were reassessed 10 years later to evaluate the BP status of the various conditions defined previously. At the first examination, 758 (54.1%), 225 (16.1%), 124 (8.9%), and 293 (20.9%) subjects were normotensive, WCHT, MHT, and SHT subjects, respectively. At the second examination, 136 normotensives (18.2%), 95 WCHT (42.6%), and 56 MHT (47.1%) subjects became SHT. As compared with normotensives, adjusting for age and sex, the risk of becoming SHT was significantly higher for WCHT and MHT subjects (odds ratio: 2.51 and 1.78, respectively; P<0.0001). Similar results were obtained when the definition of the various conditions was based on home BP. Independent contributors of worsening of hypertension status were not only baseline BP, but also, although to a lesser extent, metabolic variables and age. Subjects with WCHT and MHT are at increased risk of developing SHT. This may contribute to their prognosis that appears to be worse as compared with that of normotensive subjects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mancia et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in White-coat and masked hypertension (n=1,412). White-coat and masked hypertension vs. Normotension was evaluated on Development of a sustained hypertensive state (SHT) (OR 2.51 and 1.78, p=<0.0001). White-coat and masked hypertension significantly increased the 10-year risk of developing sustained hypertension compared with normotension (OR 2.51 and 1.78, respectively; P<0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ba9e2a4798427da6dcfbchttps://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.109.129882
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper