Key result
Masked and white-coat hypertension exhibited equivalent levels of hs-CRP and pulse wave velocity, which were higher than normotension but lower than sustained hypertension (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Do masked hypertension and white-coat hypertension have similar levels of subclinical inflammation and arterial stiffness compared to sustained hypertension and normotension?
Cross-Sectional (n=335)
Do masked hypertension and white-coat hypertension have similar levels of subclinical inflammation and arterial stiffness compared to sustained hypertension and normotension?
p-value: p=<0.05
Masked and white-coat hypertension represent intermediate states of subclinical vascular dysfunction and inflammation, worse than normotension but less severe than sustained hypertension.
Supports intermediate-risk classification for masked/white-coat hypertension; leaves open whether targeted intervention improves outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The clinical significance of masked hypertension (MHT) and white-coat hypertension (WCHT) remains controversial, whereas subclinical inflammation and arterial stiffness are associated with an adverse prognosis. We examined the interrelationships of MHT, WCHT, and sustained hypertension (SHT) with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and arterial stiffness. METHODS: Our population consisted of 291 untreated nondiabetic patients with MHT [office blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mmHg and daytime BP ≥ 135/85 mmHg; n = 32], WCHT (office BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and daytime BP < 135/85 mmHg; n = 81), SHT (office BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and daytime BP ≥ 135/85 mmHg; n = 178), and 44 age-matched and sex-matched control normotensives. RESULTS: SHT compared with WCHT, MHT, and normotension exhibited higher pulse wave velocity (PWV; 8.2 ± 1.4 vs. 7.5 ± 1.2 vs. 7.3 ± 0.9 vs. 6.8 ± 0.5 m/s, respectively; P < 0.05) and hs-CRP (2.8 ± 0.7 vs. 2.2 ± 0.6 vs. 1.9 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.3 mg/l, respectively; P < 0.05), independently of confounders. Of note, there was no difference between the MHT and WCHT groups with regard to hs-CRP and PWV levels (P = not significant). In hypertensives, hs-CRP was associated with 24-h systolic BP (r = 0.350, P < 0.0001) and PWV (r = 0.228, P < 0.0001), whereas PWV was associated with 24-h systolic BP (r = 0.330, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: MHT and WCHT represent two states of equivalent subclinical vascular dysfunction reflected by hs-CRP and PWV. Moreover, MHT and WCHT are characterized by a higher degree of inflammatory activation and arterial stiffening compared with normotension and by a lesser degree compared with SHT. The association of 24-h BP with both hs-CRP and PWV underscores the dominant role of hemodynamic load on hypertensive damage progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrikou et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=335). Masked and white-coat hypertension vs. Sustained hypertension and normotension was evaluated on Pulse wave velocity and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (p=<0.05). Masked and white-coat hypertension exhibited equivalent levels of hs-CRP and pulse wave velocity, which were higher than normotension but lower than sustained hypertension (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: