Key result
Tolvaptan improves 12-hour dyspnea relief by ~98% vs placebo in acute heart failure.
Why the study?
Given the prevalence of dyspnea in acute heart failure, this study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan on early dyspnea relief in patients with AHF.
Does tolvaptan improve early dyspnea relief in patients with acute heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=4,857)
Does tolvaptan improve early dyspnea relief in patients with acute heart failure?
Tolvaptan significantly improves early and persistent patient-assessed dyspnea in patients with acute heart failure without increasing worsening renal function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports tolvaptan for rapid dyspnea relief in acute HF; reinforces meta-analytic evidence without renal harm.
Considering the prevalence of dyspnea in acute heart failure (AHF), its reduction is important to both patients and caregivers. This meta-analysis was performed to determine the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan on early dyspnea relief in patients with AHF. A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of AHF with tolvaptan, compared with placebo or blank, were reviewed. Studies were pooled to relative risk (RR), with 95% confidence interval (CI). Five RCTs (enrolling 4857 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Tolvaptan presented significant effects on 12 h dyspnea relief (RR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.24-3.15; p = .004), 24 h/day 1 dyspnea relief (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.07-1.24; p = .0003), 48 h dyspnea relief (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.06-1.36; p = .004), and 72 h dyspnea relief (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.02-1.37; p = .03). No significant increase was noticed in the incidence of worsening renal function in tolvaptan group (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.87-1.39; p = .43). Tolvaptan treatment significantly improved patient-assessed dyspnea early and persistently in patients with AHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shang et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute heart failure (AHF) (n=4,857). Tolvaptan vs. Placebo or blank was evaluated on 12 h dyspnea relief (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.24-3.15, p=.004). Tolvaptan significantly improved 12-hour dyspnea relief compared to placebo or blank in patients with acute heart failure (RR 1.98; 95% CI 1.24-3.15; p=.004).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: