Key result
Surgical treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation lacks strong evidence-based support, whereas percutaneous edge-to-edge repair with MitraClip has demonstrated benefits in a highly selective group of patients unresponsive to guideline-directed medical therapy.
Why the study?
Despite medical therapy, secondary mitral regurgitation remains symptomatic in many patients, while the benefits of surgical procedures have remained controversial with low guideline recommendation levels.
This historical review highlights that while the efficacy of surgical correction for secondary mitral regurgitation remains controversial, percutaneous edge-to-edge repair offers proven benefits in carefully selected patients with disproportionate MR.
Supports selective MitraClip use after GDMT failure; leaves open surgical indications for secondary MR pending randomized data.
Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular heart disease. Its prognostic burden in patients suffering from idiopathic or ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction/dilation has been clearly demonstrated. Severe secondary MR is associated with an increased mortality and frequent heart failure hospitalizations. Although guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is the cornerstone of the management of secondary MR, a certain proportion of patients remain symptomatic. For these patients, several surgical techniques have been progressively developed during the last few decades (replacement, repair, sub-valvular apparatus interventions and other ventricular approaches). In the absence of evidence-based medicine, the benefits of these surgical procedures remains controversial, leading to a low level of recommendation in the guidelines. One way to anticipate the future is to look to the past. Recent prospective randomized trials evaluated surgical and percutaneous techniques and led to a better understanding of how best to treat this disease. In this article, we aim to describe the saga of the surgical and percutaneous treatments for secondary MR throughout the previous decades.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grinberg et al. (2021) conducted a review in Secondary mitral regurgitation. Invasive procedures (surgical and percutaneous repair/replacement) vs. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) was evaluated. Surgical treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation lacks strong evidence-based support, whereas percutaneous edge-to-edge repair with MitraClip has demonstrated benefits in a highly selective group of patients unresponsive to guideline-directed medical therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: