Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interpretation of the coefficient, b, in the allometric equation, y = b xk, is much disputed, and many presume it devoid of biological meaning. Difficulties impeding the interpretation of b are resolved: 1) biological significance cannot be dismissed on dimensional grounds; 2) the interval over which the measurements are valid must be stated as part of the equation; 3) b considered as the y-value at x = 1, in general has no biological meaning; 4) relations between b and k in a family of allometric equations have no biological significance. Examples which illustrate the biological meaning of b are presented in three categories: ontogenetic examples; b as a taxonomic indicator; phylogenetic and evolutionary examples. For a general interpretation of b in y = b xk where k is held constant, b is expressed in terms of a linear scale factor "s" which denotes relative magnitudes between corresponding sets of data having the same dimensionless properties (y/x, dy/dx). b can thus be interpreted as a factor dependent upon scale; and the allometric equation re-written y = s1-k xk, xi ≤ x ≤ xj, k ≠ 1. It is concluded that b is not only biologically interpretable, but that expressed in terms of s, it offers a means of quantitatively considering similarity of biologic forms which exists when corresponding measurements are in the same scale ratio (s-ratio), and when corresponding dimensionless numbers are equal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
White et al. (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: