This article discusses architectural governance failures in AI, suggesting a missing intermediate layer for effective management.
Originally published on LinkedIn on May 2, 2026. This article formalizes Boundary Governance, an architectural intermediate layer that defines decision spaces, structures rationale, synchronizes governance rhythms, and enables the exercise of accountability. The argument is architectural, not procedural: governance must be designed as a system of constraints, interfaces, and decision coordinates, not as a sequence of steps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dosanko BoundaryG (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: