Key result
An automated method for estimating regional mean transition times and radial velocities from cine MRI showed high correlation with expert manual contours (R=0.964 for F(mc) and R=0.935 for V(m)).
Why the study?
Does an automated method accurately estimate regional mean transition times and radial velocities from cine MRI compared to manual tracing in healthy subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=36)
Does an automated method accurately estimate regional mean transition times and radial velocities from cine MRI compared to manual tracing in healthy subjects?
An automated method for analyzing cine MRI provides robust and accurate assessment of regional wall motion parameters compared to manual expert tracing.
May enable efficient regional wall motion assessment on cine MRI; leaves open validation in patients with disease.
PURPOSE: To assess regional ventricular function via an accurate and automated definition of functional parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An automated method is proposed that estimates reliable regional normalized mean transition times (F(mc)) and mean radial velocities (V(m)) from cine images. This approach combines a quantitative parametric imaging method and an automated detection of the endocardial border, which is robust to the presence of papillary muscles and nonhomogeneities within the left ventricular cavity. Steady-state free-precession cine-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 36 healthy subjects was analyzed. RESULTS: The quality of the automated segmentation was assessed on a subgroup of 20 subjects by comparing the results with the manual contours traced by an expert. The comparison of functional parameters estimated consequently using the automated and the manual contours yielded (y = 0.959x + 0.016, R = 0.964) for F(mc) and (y = 0.883x + 0.505, R = 0.935) for V(m). On the entire group, F(mc) was equal to 0.392 +/- 0.069 and V(m) to 5.4 +/- 2.3 cm/s. Increasing values of the temporal parameter from the apex to the base and larger values in the septal wall than in lateral wall were demonstrated and were in accordance with the physiology. CONCLUSION: The proposed method ensures an automated and robust assessment of regional wall motion parameters, which could be clinically useful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El-Berbari et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy subjects (n=36). Automated estimation of regional mean transition times and radial velocities from cine MRI vs. Manual contours traced by an expert was evaluated on Correlation of functional parameters (F(mc) and V(m)) between automated and manual contours (R = 0.964 for F(mc), R = 0.935 for V(m)). An automated method for estimating regional mean transition times and radial velocities from cine MRI showed high correlation with expert manual contours (R=0.964 for F(mc) and R=0.935 for V(m)).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: