Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan is linked to a ~250% greater reduction in HFrEF subjects at six months versus losartan.
Why the study?
Heart failure is a major global health issue with distinct ejection fraction profiles across populations, prompting an evaluation of sacubitril/valsartan versus losartan on ejection fraction and NYHA functional class symptoms.
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve ejection fraction and NYHA functional class in heart failure patients compared to losartan?
Cohort (n=62)
No
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve ejection fraction and NYHA functional class in heart failure patients compared to losartan?
Absolute Event Rate: 56% vs 16%
Sacubitril/valsartan is more effective than losartan at improving ejection fraction and NYHA functional class in patients with heart failure over a 6-month period.
May improve EF and NYHA class more than losartan in HFrEF; hypothesis-generating from observational data requiring RCTs.
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a complicated clinical disease that develops when the Left ventricular becomes symptomatic due to anatomical or functional ventricular malfunction. The symptoms emerge from a cardiac output that is insufficient to meet the body's metabolic needs. Globally, HF has emerged as a major health issue, with an estimated prevalence of >37.7 million. While HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is more frequently seen in Indian patients, HF with preserved EF seems to be more prevalent in the western population. Objective: This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) versus losartan in patients with HF with respect to improvements in EF and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class symptoms. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 62 HF patients who are either on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy for a period of 6 months, i.e., November 2021 to April 2022, who attended the Inpatient Cardiology Department of Narayana Medical College and Hospital. By using a semi-structured questionnaire, the data was gathered. The 2013 edition of Microsoft Excel and SPSS version 20.0 software were used for data analysis. Results: Subjects in the S/V group showed a 56% reduction in subjects with HFrEF from the beginning to end of the follow-up, while subjects in the losartan group showed only 16% reduction. With respect to NYHA functional class, subjects in the S/V group showed greater reduction in subjects in NYHA class III and NYHA class IV by the end of follow-up when compared to the losartan group. Conclusion: S/V showed better efficacy in improving EF and NYHA functional class when compared to losartan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sirimandla et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=62). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Losartan was evaluated on Reduction in subjects with HFrEF. Sacubitril/valsartan therapy resulted in a 56% reduction in subjects with HFrEF compared to a 16% reduction with losartan over a 6-month follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: